When parents engage in constant disputes, the emotional toll on their children can be severe. Studies have consistently shown that children who witness frequent arguments can develop anxiety, encounter academic difficulties, and struggle with forming healthy relationships. This pattern of disturbance doesn’t just confine itself to familial boundaries—it’s starkly evident in the national stage as well.
The political arena in the Philippines mirrors a turbulent household environment, with the highly publicized disputes between former President Rodrigo Duterte and the incumbent President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. (BBM). Unfortunately, their conflicts could have deep implications for the next generation of Filipinos.
Headlines have been dominated by Duterte’s allegations against Marcos about supporting charter changes to mainly to prolong his power, and ominously warned the latter against following his father’s footsteps, suggesting that it could lead to a similar fate. Although Marcos did not seem to react violently against these personal verbal attacks, he seemed to be more concerned about Duterte’s supposed “gentleman’s agreement” with China.
This agreement allegedly allows BRP Sierra Madre to remain un-repaired in Ayungin Shoal—a decision that compromises Philippine sovereignty in the West Philippine Sea. Responses from Duterte’s camp have been inconsistent, only adding further confusion among the public.
The vitriol spilled over to their families when First Lady Liza Marcos rebuked Vice President Sara Duterte for what she considered to be inappropriate laughter during a rally where constitutional changes—and accusations of drug use against BBM—were hot topics.
These high-stakes quarrels are precisely why the “Kami Naman” movement emerged, symbolized by giant, attention-grabbing murals across the nation. This movement isn’t just a visual protest; it’s a profound call for a reformed leadership that genuinely looks after the people, fostering national unity and steering the country towards sustainable progress.
“Kami Naman” reminds our leaders: The governance style they exemplify will influence not only current policy but also the behavior of Filipinos for years to come. It is thus crucial to foster an environment where the collective good transcends personal and political ambitions, a lesson that parallels the wisdom we impart to children in their formative years.
As our leaders engage in these public spats, they mold the country’s collective psyche on authority and conflict resolution. The ongoing disputes are not just political theatre—they are cases that may define how the next generation of Filipinos perceives leadership. Our current leaders must reflect on this responsibility and strive for unity and constructive dialogue, shaping a future where collaboration triumphs over conflict for the national welfare and next generation.
